<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crash concerns plague Cambie commuters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethunderbird.ca/2008/10/21/crash-concerns-plague-cambie-commuters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethunderbird.ca/2008/10/21/crash-concerns-plague-cambie-commuters/</link>
	<description>News, analysis and commentary on Vancouver</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://thethunderbird.ca/2008/10/21/crash-concerns-plague-cambie-commuters/comment-page-1/#comment-27166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderbird.ca/?p=727#comment-27166</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason, thanks for your comment.

I did indeed call ICBC and they were able to provide me with stats from a variety of intersections. 

Unfortunately, as I noted in the article, the City of Vancouver stopped counting traffic flows so we can&#039;t calculate properly if accident rates have increased since construction started.

Cheers,

Dawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason, thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>I did indeed call ICBC and they were able to provide me with stats from a variety of intersections. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, as I noted in the article, the City of Vancouver stopped counting traffic flows so we can&#8217;t calculate properly if accident rates have increased since construction started.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Dawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://thethunderbird.ca/2008/10/21/crash-concerns-plague-cambie-commuters/comment-page-1/#comment-27165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderbird.ca/?p=727#comment-27165</guid>
		<description>Did you call ICBC about their traffic accident statistics? They have stats on almost every intersection in the province.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you call ICBC about their traffic accident statistics? They have stats on almost every intersection in the province.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi Neil</title>
		<link>http://thethunderbird.ca/2008/10/21/crash-concerns-plague-cambie-commuters/comment-page-1/#comment-27144</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderbird.ca/?p=727#comment-27144</guid>
		<description>Dear Neil,

You raise an excellent point. I&#039;ll be sure to differentiate between accidents and collisions in the future. 

I really appreciate your feedback!

Dawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Neil,</p>
<p>You raise an excellent point. I&#8217;ll be sure to differentiate between accidents and collisions in the future. </p>
<p>I really appreciate your feedback!</p>
<p>Dawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Bower</title>
		<link>http://thethunderbird.ca/2008/10/21/crash-concerns-plague-cambie-commuters/comment-page-1/#comment-26838</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Bower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderbird.ca/?p=727#comment-26838</guid>
		<description>Hi. I just wanted to say this was a nice article, but I do have one question. Did you review the collision reports to see if it was determined that these incidents were actually accidents?  I was a former instructor for Defensive Driving and one of the things that we were taught was to not use the term &quot;accident&quot; but to use the term &quot;collision&quot;. The reason being &quot;accident&quot; implies that the collision was unavoidable where in most cases collisions are preventable (to do everything reasonable to prevent it). According to the Canada Safety Council, 85% of all collisions are preventable thus leaving only 15% of these deemed unpreventable or accidents.

So, why am I telling you this? Traffic safety is everyones concern. You are a student in a journalism school and with that position you have the ability to increase public awareness of driving safety by subtle means through your articles. One word can make a difference.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I just wanted to say this was a nice article, but I do have one question. Did you review the collision reports to see if it was determined that these incidents were actually accidents?  I was a former instructor for Defensive Driving and one of the things that we were taught was to not use the term &#8220;accident&#8221; but to use the term &#8220;collision&#8221;. The reason being &#8220;accident&#8221; implies that the collision was unavoidable where in most cases collisions are preventable (to do everything reasonable to prevent it). According to the Canada Safety Council, 85% of all collisions are preventable thus leaving only 15% of these deemed unpreventable or accidents.</p>
<p>So, why am I telling you this? Traffic safety is everyones concern. You are a student in a journalism school and with that position you have the ability to increase public awareness of driving safety by subtle means through your articles. One word can make a difference.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
