<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TheThunderbird.ca from UBC journalism &#187; Celluloid Subculture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethunderbird.ca/category/blogs/2011/celluloid-subculture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethunderbird.ca</link>
	<description>News, analysis and commentary on Vancouver</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>All that glitters is not glamour</title>
		<link>http://thethunderbird.ca/2011/02/06/all-that-glitters-is-not-glamour/</link>
		<comments>http://thethunderbird.ca/2011/02/06/all-that-glitters-is-not-glamour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea Blazer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celluloid Subculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audrey Hepburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marilyn Monroe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tourist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderbird.ca/?p=14763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video may have killed the radio star, but then the Internet went ahead and killed the glamorous Hollywood star too. Case in point: the Justin Bieber fever infecting the cover of Vanity Fair. In one of the oldest most high-class magazines that once featured stars such as Grace Kelly and Elizabeth Taylor, is now the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video may have killed the radio star, but then the Internet went ahead and killed the glamorous Hollywood star too. Case in point: the Justin Bieber fever infecting the cover of <em><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2011/02/justin-bieber-slide-show-201102">Vanity Fair</a></em>. In one of the oldest most high-class magazines that once featured stars such as Grace Kelly and Elizabeth Taylor, is now the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28VmUxTDU5Q">16-year-old YouTube sensation.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moviemaidens.com/">Glamour </a>simply no longer exists. The very word evokes stylized images from <a href="http://ils.unc.edu/dpr/path/goldenhollywood/">30s and 40s Hollywood</a>: red lips, long flowing gowns, voluptuous curves, perfectly poised hairstyles and complete elegance. And while modern Hollywood endlessly writes about stars imitating this glamorous flair, the truth is they can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As society&#8217;s expectations of talent fades and the binaries between celebrity culture and stardom blur, classic Hollywood memories evoke, now more than ever, a nostalgic yearning for a period when glamour had a particular aura.</p>
<p><a href="http://thethunderbird.ca/files/2011/01/tourist-jolie-depp1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-14771 alignright" title="tourist-jolie-depp" src="http://thethunderbird.ca/files/2011/01/tourist-jolie-depp1-300x174.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="174" /></a></p>
<p>Take, for instance, the recent film, <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tourist_(2010_film)">The Tourist</a></em>. <em>The Touris</em>t recalls a golden age of cinema with it’s elaborately lush costumes and colorful romantic backdrops. The very pairing of Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp reminds us of a time when moviegoers went to the theatre to go see the stars and the glam, and then perhaps the film.</p>
<p>But the second one steps outside the theatre, they are overburdened by a vast selection of images and information about <a href="http://perezhilton.com/category/angelina-jolie/">Angelina Jolie’s</a> every move online and in magazines. With pictures of Jolie walking her six kids to school or showing off her tattoo infested arms, the glamour fades. Fast.</p>
<p>Today, Hollywood is full of talented and beautiful women but there is no mystery. The way the media delves into star’s lives leaves little room for secrecy or control. And that, I believe, is what made the women of the classic Hollywood era so glamorous: mystery, elegance and exoticism</p>
<p>All these women had it: <a href="http://www.bombshells.com/gallery/monroe/">Marilyn Monroe</a>, Audrey Hepburn, Marlene Dietrich, Natalie Wood, and Dorothy Dandridge.</p>
<div id="attachment_14768" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 235px"><a href="http://thethunderbird.ca/files/2011/01/lizt_portrait_bw2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-14768" title="lizt_portrait_bw2" src="http://thethunderbird.ca/files/2011/01/lizt_portrait_bw2.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image courtesy of Reel Classics </p></div>
<p>But the woman still most synonymously associated with glamour is <a href="http://www.reelclassics.com/Actresses/Liz_Taylor/liz.htm">Elizabeth Taylor</a>. Almost always shown in an exquisite evening dress and diamonds, of course, Taylor left a sensational legacy in the world of Hollywood still greatly remembered today. Her relationships were shown in the media, but never in excess and certainly not outside the realm of a upscale party.</p>
<p>Least we forget that Elizabeth Taylor, beyond her glamour and beauty, also won two Oscars in her career as an actress.</p>
<p>It was an era of endless beauty and talent. Actresses and actors epitomized style and yet seemed to easily evoke a sense of mystery, sex and control. It is a glamour that is no longer accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thethunderbird.ca/2011/02/06/all-that-glitters-is-not-glamour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Star is (Re)Born</title>
		<link>http://thethunderbird.ca/2011/02/06/a-star-is-reborn/</link>
		<comments>http://thethunderbird.ca/2011/02/06/a-star-is-reborn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea Blazer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celluloid Subculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Star is Born]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judy Garland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Classic Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wizard of Oz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderbird.ca/?p=14149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, yet another classic appeared across Canadian movie screens after years of waiting from eager fans. The film was the 1954 version of A Star is Born and it was shown at the Scotia Bank Cineplex as part of The Classic Series. The monthly series since September has showcased some of Hollywood&#8217;s best motion [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thethunderbird.ca/files/2011/01/star-is-born-l2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14361" title="star-is-born-l" src="http://thethunderbird.ca/files/2011/01/star-is-born-l2-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>Last week, yet another classic appeared across Canadian movie screens after years of waiting from eager <a href="http://www.judygarlandclub.org/">fans.</a></p>
<p>The film was the 1954 version of <em>A Star is Born</em> and it was shown at the Scotia Bank Cineplex as part of <a href="http://www.cineplex.com/Events/ClassicFilmSeries/Home.aspx">The Classic Series.</a> The monthly series since September has showcased some of Hollywood&#8217;s best motion pictures and will offer a total of twelve films.</p>
<p>The idea: showcase classic movies in theatre in digital and HD format.</p>
<p>The reality: just another example of classic cinema surging into the mainstream. And it’s about time. In the spirit of preserving our film heritage, it seems the major companies have finally taken to projecting these Hollywood gems onto the big screen.</p>
<p>But before delving into a discussion of the resurgence of classic cinema, I must admit that when I heard that <em><a href="http://www.jgdb.com/star.htm">A Star Is Born</a></em><a href="http://www.jgdb.com/star.htm"> </a>was playing in digital format, I could barely contain my excitement.</p>
<p>The film, an epic allegory for Garland’s life and the artificiality of Hollywood itself, was Garland’s reentrance into the spotlight after an attempted suicide in 1950. The re-offered version includes deleted scenes that were not shown to original audiences in the 1950s.</p>
<p>Judy Garland’s marvel entrance on screen in electric coloring and sparkling HD, however, quickly turned my excitement to disorientation, and then excitement again. As I sat in the exact theatre I had seen <em>Black Swan</em> the week before, I marveled at the fact that I was seeing Garland perform on the same screen as Natalie Portman near days apart….Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.</p>
<p>No one else in the audience seemed to have the same moment of mystification. Audience members clapped from the onset of the film, as Garland’s name appeared on the screen. The clapping continued following the prolonged (and tad egotistical) sequences of Garland performing- a reminder to the audience that true talent exists, somewhere.</p>
<p>Following the film, I spoke to Sara Marshall, assistant to the Communications Manager of CEO, about <a href="http://www.cineplex.com/default.aspx">Cineplex’s</a> decision to showcase classic films this year.</p>
<p>“I think there is something to be said seeing a movie that you’ve loved since you were kids. It’s a bit of a novelty. People really respond to that,” she told me.</p>
<p>The packed audience certainly showed this to be true.</p>
<p>So, whether you&#8217;re a movie buff or think there is something fantastical in seeing classic cinema in HD format, Cineplex in Canada will be offering <a href="http://www.allmovie.com/work/doctor-zhivago-14162">Doctor Zhivago </a>next month followed by The Wizard of Oz . Did I mention the tickets are just $5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thethunderbird.ca/2011/02/06/a-star-is-reborn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
