When one of the city’s most prolific developers proposed 60 West Cordova on the edge of the Downtown Eastside in 2010, he promised it would be a bold new experiment in housing affordability.
The units would be priced as low as possible and sold only to those who lived, worked, or volunteered in the neighbourhood. Buyers would have to agree to live in their units and promise not to sell for at least a year — a strategy meant to discourage investors.
But some of the early buyers who got a great deal cashed out shortly after the one-year limit, turning profits as high as $74,000 on their “affordable” units. Others have begun renting out their units. Sixteen per cent of the condos in the building are no longer owner-occupied.
Even to those who stayed, 60 West Cordova now seems like little more than another condo project in a gentrifying area.
“If I were to come in now and buy the apartment that I’m in now from somebody else, I wouldn’t find it that affordable,” said Sylvia Lim, a resident who bought her unit when the building opened in 2012. “I would sort of see it as being on the average price range for most one-bedroom condos in the area.”
Nathan Edelson, a former planner for the Downtown Eastside, said he admires the experimental nature of 60 West Cordova, but sees the end result as “embarrassing” because it failed to plan for the second generation of buyers in the building.
When developer Ian Gillespie’s firm Westbank proposed the project, it took numerous measures to ensure that it would be able to sell the units at rates that would be affordable to people making less than $40,000 per year. These included lobbying the city to reduce its parking requirement to only 19 spaces for the 108-unit building, spending minimally on marketing, furnishing units with lower-cost fixtures, and partnering with Vancity credit union to offer flexible financing for buyers.
There are 12 non-market units in the building — four managed by Habitat for Humanity and eight by PHS Community Services. Prices for the 96 market-rate units started at $219,900, and nearly three quarters of the units were originally sold for less than $300,000.
Lim said she chose to buy at 60 West Cordova because it was affordable. It would have cost her the same amount to rent in the area as she ended up paying for her mortgage, she said.
“I think it made sense,” Lim said. “The price range for this building was quite reasonable.”
In 2013, five of the building’s market-rate units were resold for prices ranging from $306,000 to $330,000, netting an average profit of almost $56,000 for those sellers.
- Home prices restricted to a fixed annual increase, most based on consumer price index
- 2013 sales started at $179,899 for a one-bedroom unit
- Target sale price for homes is between $250 and $300 per square foot
- Buyers must be employed in Whistler to qualify
- Funded in part by contributions from private developers
- Buyers can purchase homes for 20 per cent below market value, but must agree to sell them for 20 per cent below market value
- Buyers must agree to live in the homes, not rent them
- Preference given to SFU faculty and staff with children, before open market
- Buyers can purchase on-campus homes for 33 per cent below market value, but must agree to sell for 33 per cent below market value or less
- Option for second mortgage held by university equal to 33 per cent of the purchase price of a new home. No payments made on that mortgage until resale, when payment equals 33 per cent of sale price.
- Only available to faculty
- Implementation beginning this year
“Two or three sales of that sort would really make a difference on the affordability (of a building),” Edelson said.
Indeed, these sales have triggered a shift in assessed values at 60 West Cordova. For 2014, nearly three quarters of the units are valued at more than $300,000.
Attracting first-time buyers
In an email, Westbank spokeswoman Jill Killeen said this shift was expected. The developer’s goal for the market-rate condos was to attract first-time home buyers and keep out “flippers” and investors, not to create a long-term affordable homeownership model like the one in place for the building’s non-market units, she said.
“It should be expected that assessed values are higher than the original purchase price because the homes were purposely sold for less than market value as that was the goal of the project,” she said.
Because of this potential for rapid increases in values, Edelson said he would prefer not to see the city invest in affordable homeownership — as it did by reducing its parking requirement for the 60 West Cordova project — unless there’s a mechanism to keep prices down.
While the building remains on the low end of the Vancouver condo market, some of those first-time home buyers it was originally constructed for have already been priced out. A pair of units currently on the market for $335,000 and $339,500 originally sold for $232,000 and $250,000, respectively. If sold for their asking prices, those units would only be affordable — defined as costing 30 percent or less of a person’s total income — to people making $60,000 or more per year.
The market-rate condos at 60 West Cordova are still mostly cheaper than their counterparts in the nearby Woodwards building — also a Westbank project — but their values have been rising more quickly.The real thing is, when you sell the unit, what are you selling it for?A sampling of six Woodwards condos that sold in 2013 for prices in the $350,000 range showed sellers making profits comparable to those found in the 60 West Cordova sales. The difference is that Woodwards units have been appreciating for four years now, compared to just two for 60 West Cordova.
As the city plans to add more than 8,000 “affordable homeownership” units over the course of the recently approved Downtown Eastside local area plan, it will need to look at ways to prevent the price spikes seen at 60 West Cordova, Edelson said.
Affordable homeownership is a model that only works if there are restrictions in place to keep prices low for future generations of buyers, he said.
“The real thing is, when you sell the unit, what are you selling it for?” Edelson said “It’s good that you have to wait at least a year, but beyond that, what is (the price)? … The mechanism around resale is the critical one.”