Tuesday, November 28, 2023
News, analysis and commentary by UBC Journalism students

Historic townhouse needs protection

By Doerthe Keilholz Built in 1907, the historic townhouse at 1080 Richards Street is an example of what can happen…

By Doerthe Keilholz , in Culture , on December 5, 2007

By Doerthe Keilholz The historic townhouse at 1080 Richards in November 2007.

Built in 1907, the historic townhouse at 1080 Richards Street is an example of what can happen when heritage homes aren’t protected.

The house was threatened with demolition for years, until the City of Vancouver advocated saving this one by moving it a few doors up the street so that developers can build a condo building in its place.

At least three other houses from the same period were demolished in the 1000 block of Richards Street over the last decade.

An Edwardian-inspired “Gable-Front” house, it is one of the last remnants of a time when the downtown area was a quiet, tree-lined residential neighbourhood.

The home’s first owner was Joseph Clarke and his business partner Joseph Arthur Perry. As more white-collar jobs were created in the central business district in the early 20th century, young men with their families wanted to live close enough to walk to work or to take the streetcar.

The house’s most recent resident was Michelle Monforton, a filmmaker, who signed a lease in September 2002 and made the place a shelter for backpackers and people with one year work visas. The house was in such a bad state that it took her five months before she could finally move in.

Michelle Monforton with one of the grates she took from her old home. The plant pot (r.) is made of the house's chimney. During the renovation, Monforton found old porn and health magazines from 1938 with naked women leaning casually on a tree, and fitness exercises for “her,” pointing out the women’s duty to stay in shape while the men were fighting in the war.

Monforton received a notice in December 2005 that the owner, Y.J.K Holdings Ltd., had sold 1080 Richards street along with five other premises on Richards, to Chandler Richards Street Ventures Ltd.

When Monforton obtained a letter from Chandler on September 7, 2006 announcing that her tenancy agreement will end in November the latest, she sought advice at the B.C. office of housing. She was told that the developer has no authority to make her move out before he obtains the necessary permits. So Michelle stayed.

On October 19, 2006 Chandler Richards Street Ventures Ltd. offered her $12,000, and “full salvage rights” on the property to end her tenancy by February 2007.

She finally signed the contract, but before she moved out in February, she took everything old with her: the wooden banister, parts of the floor, the doors, the chimney, and the crates. Some of the parts decorate her new home now, others were given to friends and people interested in heritage objects.

It remains to be seen whether the house can be moved until it has been peer-reviewed. If the house will be refurbished, Monforton is willing to donate the pieces she removed to preserve the house’s heritage value.


  • The way the city of Vancouver looks is a direct reflection of City Hall planning. Why don’t you interview someone there.

    In my opinion I am all for new architecture. It is just generally safer for occupants to live in the most updated of construction practices and materials. The city planning department I believe is responsible for making sure that new buildings in Vancouver
    fit in well with the surrounding architecture. While it might seem I am critical of your article. I think the diversity of articles on this site is great after I read further. These are just suggestions from someone older but not necessarily wiser.


  • I used to live in that house with Michelle and some other great friends (’04). It had character and charm which I know i’ll never experience again in any home. Michelle put her heart and soul into every square inch of that place and i’ll never forget it. So many great memories. Michelle if you read this, i hope you’re doing well.

Leave a Reply